CORBIN —
Perhaps the greatest collection of genius in one place at one time took place in Philadelphia in 1787 — the Constitutional Convention. We too often fail to appreciate how revolutionary, subversive and radical their ideas are.
But we too frequently treat the “Founding Fathers” as infallible moral authorities and all sides appropriate them for contemporary political reasons. They were brilliant, farsighted and courageous, but they were mortal, fallible — and sometimes acted on self-interest and in partisan ways.
The next time someone quotes Thomas Jefferson on the Constitution, recall he wasn’t there. He was in France, urging on their bloody revolutionaries and trying to woo a young married woman. Go back and read his correspondence with James Madison during that period. Jefferson questioned the adoption of a new government. He preferred to strengthen — slightly — the Articles of Confederation. Read Jefferson’s thoughts on “a nation of yeoman farmers” before adopting him as an authority to oppose farm subsidies. Both Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton were members of George Washington’s cabinet, yet both undermined Washington’s foreign policy, each flirting with treason by encouraging French (Jefferson) and British (Hamilton) intrigue.
Madison’s “Publius” argued for a strong central government in The Federalist Papers. Yet after the Constitution was ratified, he and Jefferson wrote the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions, arguing a state could exercise its sovereignty to disregard federally enacted laws. But President Madison later opposed the idea when New England states wanted to nullify embargoes and customs laws used to finance the War of 1812. Jefferson believed the Louisiana Purchase was unconstitutional — but that didn’t stop him.
Jefferson is sometimes invoked by those defending unregulated free markets and even Wall Street where self-described “Titans of the Universe” move paper around to make fortunes. Jefferson despised “stock-jobbers,” the derisive term he used to dismiss Hamilton’s financial system. That system, by the way, was based entirely upon government debt and credit. But Jefferson acquiesced when he cravenly traded votes for Hamilton’s plan to assume state debts in exchange for locating the national capitol in Washington.
Nevada Senate candidate Sharon Angle recently said Washington, Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin were “conservatives.” Well they were so conservative, they engaged in armed revolution. Jefferson was forever in debt, spending far beyond his means on fine French wines, books and furniture. He’s believed to have fathered children by a slave who could hardly say no. Franklin maintained a second family during his stay in Britain, fathered an illegitimate child who in turn fathered one of his own. Franklin expressly denied the divinity of Jesus and Washington and Jefferson seemed at times to question it. Franklin used the Postal Service to get rich and secure a government job for his son. Jefferson and Madison used government funds to bankroll a newspaper to promote their political agenda and attack opponents. All at one time or another owned other human beings — although Franklin later became an abolitionist and Washington freed his slaves upon his death.
These men and others created a revolution second only to that incited by Jesus. Unlike Jesus, they were imperfect. Their foibles and humanity don’t detract from their accomplishment. Their ideas and ideals remain the best guides for how we should govern ourselves. They are due our reverence and gratitude —but not our worship.
We would be wise to remember they would not recognize the world in which we live. Next time an opponent of the health care reform quotes one of those revolutionary titans, remember they believed an effective medical treatment for most illnesses was to bleed patients with leeches, a remedy which may have killed Washington.
Ronnie Ellis writes for CNHI News Service and is based in Frankfort, Ky. He may be contacted by email at rellis@cnhi.com. Follow CNHI News Service stories on Twitter at www.twitter.com/cnhifrankfort.
Editorials
Even the founding fathers had an agenda
- Editorials
-
-
‘Trust, but verify’ saves lives, shrinks govt.
Transparency not only makes government smaller, less costly and more responsive to its constituents. It saves lives, too.
-
To hear, or not to hear, that’s the question
“Intolerance,” “Battleship Potemkin,” “Gone With the Wind,” “The Wizard of Oz,” “War of the Worlds,” “South Pacific” and “Casablanca,” seven movies that come to mind when I think of fine, well-made, popular and award-winning films.
-
Haiti — The Cross made the difference
For the past four weeks I have been writing a series of articles about Haiti. I wanted to write this series to highlight the two-year anniversary of the devastating earthquake of Jan. 12, 2010.
-
Idolatry — American’s growing preference
“Thou shall have no other gods before me” [Exodus 20:3] is a clear directive. Our Maker rightfully deserves a paramount and exclusive love, honor and adoration.
-
Redistricting plans equally indefensible
I don’t know how Franklin Circuit Judge Phillip Shepherd will rule in the re-districting case. Nor am I a constitutional attorney, so I can’t say with any authority the maps drawn by the Democratic controlled House to benefit Democrats or the one drawn by the Republican Senate to benefit Republicans are constitutional.
-
Redistricting ruling offers collateral benefits for voters, taxpayers
“Rethink Possible” is AT&T’s current marketing motto. Government’s dictum, on the other hand, is “Regulate Possible until rethinking possible becomes impossible.”
-
Take trips, they’re good for your heart
Looks as if winter will be just a whiff of cold weather and maybe a bit of snow. February is here, though, and I’ve experienced quite a few bad snowstorms in that month.
-
Common sense job hunting
I spent a day with a high-powered, high profile friend who mentioned that more than 700 people a year ask him to help them get a new job.
-
And you will help... right?
I began writing a series of columns this month about the country of Haiti. I did so to highlight the two-year anniversary of the earthquake that occurred on Jan. 12, 2010. By writing this series I hope to engage a new group of people to see their role in making a difference in a country and for a people that so desperately need our help.
-
Destruction by distraction
“How would you feel if your surgeon were operating on you while he’s talking on a hands-free phone?” are the words of Amy N. Ship, M.D., professor at Harvard Medical School. Ship is convinced that many do not understand the risk of using a cell phone while driving.
- More Editorials Headlines
-









